← back to legend
Validation & fab

DRC

Design Rule Check
Software check of the layout: trace too thin, clearance violations, drill out of fab spec.

How it looks

Real geometry: CORE3588 copper, drawn from our board file (2D plan view)
11 mm
Top copper of CORE3588 beside the module connector J1, drawn from our board file. The light bars on the right are the connector's pads, 0.4 mm apart. DRC checks every gap like this, all over the board.
Real data: DRC run on our board file
kicad-cli pcb drc core3588.kicad_pcbFound 0 unconnected itemsclearance errors: 0track width errors: 0hole size errors: 0shorts: 07 malformed courtyard (imported library shapes)162 library footprint mismatch (silkscreen removed)
What our own DRC run on CORE3588 printed (KiCad 10, run on a scratch copy). Every electrical and fab check passes; the 169 notices left are about library drawings, not copper.

How it works

gap 0.10 mm, rule says 0.20: ERRORtrack moved: gap 0.20 mm, passesalso: track widths, hole sizes, unconnected nets, shorts, board edgeTWO TRACKS OF DIFFERENT NETS, SEEN FROM ABOVE

Where it fits

DRC checks the board layout; ERC checks the schematic. The numbers it uses are the clearance and widths from the fab.

For Ants, KiCad's DRC is the benchmark referee: a clean board means zero DRC errors added.

← back to legend